Close Menu

Snow And Ice Slip-And-Fall Claims In Michigan – When Property Owners Are Responsible

WomanFillingSlipAndFallAccidentReport

Winters in Michigan are no joke. In cities like Detroit, Southfield, and beyond, snow and ice are a regular part of daily life for several months out of the year. But while everyone expects some degree of inconvenience during winter, slipping and falling on untreated ice shouldn’t be one of them. As personal injury attorneys who have helped countless clients across Michigan, we’ve seen how devastating these accidents can be, especially when they’re caused by a property owner who failed to take care of their premises.

We’re often asked if property owners are legally responsible for injuries caused by snow or ice. The answer depends on several important factors under Michigan law. If you’ve been hurt in a fall, keep reading. We’ll explain when you may have a claim and what the law actually says about your rights.

What Michigan Law Says About Snow And Ice Slip-And-Falls

Michigan slip and fall law is based in part on premises liability, which holds that property owners must keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition. When it comes to snow and ice, Michigan courts have followed what’s known as the “open and obvious” doctrine. This means that if the danger from the snow or ice is considered obvious to a reasonable person, then the property owner might not be held liable.

However, there are exceptions. In Hoffner v. Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450 (2012), the Michigan Supreme Court reinforced the idea that an “open and obvious” condition generally eliminates liability—unless there are “special aspects” that make the condition unreasonably dangerous despite being obvious.

If a patch of black ice was not visible, or if the conditions were unusual and unreasonably dangerous, you may still have a valid case. This is why these cases are so fact-specific. Whether you’re dealing with a parking lot in Southfield or a sidewalk in downtown Detroit, the location, lighting, weather conditions, and what the property owner did or didn’t do all matter.

Types Of Property Owners Who May Be Held Liable

We evaluate snow and ice fall cases based on who owns or controls the property where the accident occurred. Some common examples include:

  • Commercial Property Owners – Businesses that invite customers onto their property owe a high duty of care. This includes clearing sidewalks, parking lots, and entryways in a reasonable timeframe after snow falls.
  • Residential Landlords – Landlords of multi-unit dwellings like apartment complexes must maintain common areas, which include salting and shoveling walkways.
  • Municipalities – Suing a city or town in Michigan for a sidewalk or road-related fall involves a different set of rules, including shorter deadlines and notice requirements under MCL 691.1404.

What Needs To Be Proven In These Cases

To bring a successful slip and fall claim in Michigan, we must show:

  1. The property owner owed you a duty of care.
  2. The property owner breached that duty.
  3. You were injured as a direct result of that breach.

In snow and ice cases, we often bring in photos, surveillance footage, weather reports, and witness testimony. Timing is everything. If you were injured on a property that hadn’t been salted or cleared within a reasonable time, or if the ice was invisible (like black ice), you may have a strong claim, even if the condition was technically “obvious.”

Why Timing Matters For Filing A Claim

Michigan has a strict statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including slip and fall accidents. Under MCL 600.5805(2), you generally have three years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit. If your claim is against a government entity, notice must be provided within 120 days under MCL 691.1404.

Waiting too long can destroy your case. We encourage clients to contact us right away so we can gather the necessary evidence while it’s still available.

Frequently Asked Questions About Snow And Ice Slip-And-Fall Accidents In Michigan

Can I Sue If I Slipped On Ice In A Parking Lot In Detroit?

Yes, if the parking lot is privately owned and was not properly maintained, you may have a claim. The property owner must take reasonable steps to keep the lot safe. If the ice was hidden, like black ice, and the owner had a chance to treat it and didn’t, that could support liability. We’ll look at factors like how long the hazard existed, what kind of warning was given (if any), and whether the ice was visible under the lighting conditions at the time of your fall.

What Is The “Open And Obvious” Rule And How Can It Affect My Case?

The “open and obvious” rule in Michigan means a property owner might not be held responsible if the danger from snow or ice was clearly visible and should have been avoided by a reasonable person. However, this rule isn’t absolute. If the hazard had special aspects that made it unreasonably dangerous—such as unavoidable black ice or poor lighting that prevented detection—you may still have a viable claim. Our firm knows how to assess when these exceptions apply.

How Quickly Does A Property Owner Need To Remove Snow Or Ice?

Michigan law does not set a specific number of hours for removal, but property owners must act within a “reasonable time” after a snowfall. What counts as reasonable depends on the circumstances – when the snow stopped falling, the severity of the storm, and whether it was a commercial or residential property. A delay of several hours or overnight in high-traffic areas could be considered negligent, especially if no action was taken at all.

What Should I Do After Slipping And Falling On Ice?

Immediately document the scene. Take photos or videos of the ice, your injuries, and anything that may help prove the property was unsafe. Report the incident to the property owner or manager and get a copy of any written report. Seek medical attention and follow all recommended treatments. Finally, speak to a personal injury attorney right away. The sooner we get involved, the better chance we have of preserving the evidence and proving fault.

Does It Matter If I Was Wearing Proper Footwear?

It can, but it’s rarely the deciding factor. Insurance companies may argue that your footwear contributed to the fall, especially if you were wearing non-winter shoes. However, property owners still have a legal duty to fix or warn about hazardous conditions. A person in regular footwear shouldn’t be expected to detect or avoid hidden black ice. We’ll evaluate all facts to determine if your case is strong enough to move forward.

Can I Still File A Claim If I Was Partially At Fault?

Yes. Michigan follows a modified comparative fault rule under MCL 600.2959. If you were less than 50% responsible for your fall, you can still recover damages—but your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if a jury finds you 30% at fault and your damages are $100,000, you would receive $70,000. If you’re found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover.

Call Ravid & Associates, P.C. About Your Snow And Ice Slip-And-Fall Accident

At Ravid & Associates, P.C., we’ve been fighting for injured Michigan residents for decades. If you or someone you love slipped and fell on snow or ice in Detroit, Southfield, or anywhere across Michigan, we want to help. Our legal team is ready to evaluate your case and determine whether the property owner may be held responsible for your injuries.

Our firm represents injury victims across the state of Michigan from our offices in Southfield. If you suffered a snow or ice fall injury, contact our Detroit premises liability lawyer by calling (248) 948-9696 to receive your free consultation. Your consultation is free, and you don’t pay anything unless we win. We proudly serve clients in Detroit, Southfield, and throughout the entire state of Michigan.

FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
author avatar
Ravid & Associates, P.C.